USPTO serial 74680055
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D - 83233 Bernau am Chiemsee, DE
D - 83233 Bernau am Chiemsee, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Scalise
MICHAEL F SCALISE HODGSON, RUSS, ANDREWS, WOODS & GOODYEAR1800 ONE M & T PLZBUFFALO, NY 14203UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beers; mineral, aerated water and drinking water containing carbonic acid; soda waters, lemonade, orangeade, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and powdered concentrate for making lemonade, orangeade, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks, fruit drinks and isotonic drinks; soft drinks that provide an energy boost | ABANDONED | — |
| 033 | whiskey, gin, sherry, port, brandy spirits, alcoholic bitters, wines, potable spirits, distilled spirits and liqueurs; prepared alcoholic cocktails and aperitifs with a distilled alcoholic liquor or wine base; wine coolers, prepared wine cocktails, wine punches, | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |