USPTO serial 74680107
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
SUNNYVALE, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. KELLY
DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &DUNNER, LLP1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | mouse pads and computer software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |