Drawing for GOLF DISCOUNT

USPTO serial 74680240

GOLF DISCOUNT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLF DISCOUNT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea R. Powers

ANDREA R POWERS COHN, POWELL & HIND, PCCLAYTON PLZ BLDG7700 CLAYTON RDST LOUIS, MO 63117

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042retail store services in the field of golf equipmentACTIVEJan 1, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 6, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 6, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 10, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 4, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 14, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 19, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance