USPTO serial 74680382
PRONATURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRONATURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Agoura Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Geller
JAY H GELLER E TWRSTE 6002425 W OLYMPIC BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary and nutritional supplements, preparations for treatment of the symptoms of menopause, antacids | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |