Drawing for FOODTOWN QUALITY & VALUE

USPTO serial 74680855

FOODTOWN QUALITY & VALUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOODTOWN QUALITY & VALUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence I. Lerner

LAWRENCE I LERNER LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical and health care products, and preparations, namely, rubbing alcohol, peroxide for medicinal purposesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1996DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 26, 1996DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance