USPTO serial 74680940
COUNTER TRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COUNTER TRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PARALIGHT LASER TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Toronto, Ontario, M5R 3H8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick B. Ziesenheim
FREDERICK B ZIESENHEIM WEBB ZIESENHEIM BRUENING LOGSDON ET AL700 KOPPERS BLDG436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | optical disks; optical data carriers; apparatus for recording optical disks; apparatus for reading optcial disks; data storage devices which include optical disks, magnetic disks, apparatus for recording optical disks, apparatus for recording magnetic disks, apparatus for reading optical disks and apparatus for reading magnetic disks; and computer software for controlling optical disks, magnetic disks, optical data carriers, magnetic data carriers, apparatus for recording optcal disks, apparatus for recording magnetic disks, apparatus for reading optical disks, apparatus for reading magnetic disks and data storage devices as data storage devices are defined above | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |