Drawing for NUTRITION 21

USPTO serial 74681174

NUTRITION 21

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUTRITION 21?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter H. Karlen

PETER H KARLEN PETER H KARLEN, A.P.L.C.1205 PROSPECT ST STE 400LA JOLLA, CA 92037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005dietary food supplements, meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes, electrolyte replacement drinks, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of angina and diabetesACTIVE—
029edible fats, fruit based fillings for cakes and pies, diary based food beverages, vegetable juice beverages, edible oils used for cooking, salads and salad dressings; french fried and processed potatoes; vegetable protein bits having bacon flavor; nut and pumpkin based fillings for cakes and pies; non-dairy based beverages, namely, soy based beverage used as a milk substituteACTIVE—
030breakfast wafers, breakfast cereals, bubble gum, candy, chewing gum, seasonings, teas, salad dressings and chocolate-based fillings for cakes and piesACTIVE—
031cat food, dog food, food for other pets, cattle feed, pig feed, and fresh produce, namely potatoes, tomatoes, and carrotsACTIVE—
032spring, seltzer, carbonated, mineral and drinking water containing juice and fruit; non-alcoholic rice-based soft drinks consisting primarily of water and rice; distilled carbonated, quinine, mineral, seltzer, spring, table, and drinking waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 1999EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 1999EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 12, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 24, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 30, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 26, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 4, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 18, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance