USPTO serial 74681174
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter H. Karlen
PETER H KARLEN PETER H KARLEN, A.P.L.C.1205 PROSPECT ST STE 400LA JOLLA, CA 92037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary food supplements, meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes, electrolyte replacement drinks, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of angina and diabetes | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | edible fats, fruit based fillings for cakes and pies, diary based food beverages, vegetable juice beverages, edible oils used for cooking, salads and salad dressings; french fried and processed potatoes; vegetable protein bits having bacon flavor; nut and pumpkin based fillings for cakes and pies; non-dairy based beverages, namely, soy based beverage used as a milk substitute | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | breakfast wafers, breakfast cereals, bubble gum, candy, chewing gum, seasonings, teas, salad dressings and chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | cat food, dog food, food for other pets, cattle feed, pig feed, and fresh produce, namely potatoes, tomatoes, and carrots | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | spring, seltzer, carbonated, mineral and drinking water containing juice and fruit; non-alcoholic rice-based soft drinks consisting primarily of water and rice; distilled carbonated, quinine, mineral, seltzer, spring, table, and drinking water | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |