Drawing for CRESCENT EXTRAS

USPTO serial 74681283

CRESCENT EXTRAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRESCENT EXTRAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curtis B. Hamre

GREGORY A SEBALD MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR 90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042retail services in the field of jewelry, namely incentive sales program based on total amounts of previous purchasesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 21, 1998EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 22, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 7, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 21, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance