USPTO serial 74681343
WILD ROSE COUNTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WILD ROSE COUNTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Langley, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas T. Johnson
DOUGLAS T JOHNSON MILLER & MARTINSTE 1000, VOLUNTEER BLDG832 GEORGIA AVECHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail store and mail order services in the field of gifts and souvenirs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |