USPTO serial 74681549
INACALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CATALDO, PETER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INACALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick C. Stephenson
PATRICK C STEPHENSON MCGRATH, N MULLIN & KRATZ, PCSTE 1400 ONE CENTRAL PARK PLZ222 S FIFTEENTH STOMAHA, NE 68102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | international telephone calling services; inbound (toll free) telephone communication services; local telephone connection and communication services; audio, video and data teleconferencing services; cellular transmission, receipt and/or storage of voice, data and/or video; electronic transmission, receipt and/or storage of voice, data and/or video; global computer network telecommunications connection services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |