USPTO serial 74682326
ITI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa A. Landy
LISA A LANDY STEEL HECTOR & DAVIS200 S BISCAYNE BLVDSTE 4000MIAMI, FL 33131-2398Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | visual and electronic personal identification recognition system, primarily comprising plastic cards with integrated circuit and memory (smart cards), plastic cards with coated magnetic stripes, plastic cards with bar codes, computer circuit boards, blank floppy disks, and computer software and firmware to analyze the foregoing plastic cards used to identify and recognize individuals | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | design to the order and specification of others of visual and electronic personal identification and recognition systems comprising of plastic identification cards and computer software and firmware for analysis of the cards | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |