Drawing for ANTECH

USPTO serial 74682524

ANTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ANTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

P. Weston Musselman, Jr.

P WESTON MUSSELMAN JR JENKENS & GILCHRIST1445 ROSS AVESTE 3200DALLAS, TX 75202-2799

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer software design for others, namely computer system design and integration of computer networks; and computer consultationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 1997ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 2, 1997OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 2, 1997OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 1, 1997OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 1, 1997OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 21, 1997OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 29, 1996OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 2, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 26, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance