Drawing for LOG CABIN HOMES

USPTO serial 74682845

LOG CABIN HOMES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOG CABIN HOMES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Just

DAVID L JUST LUCAS & JUST60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042architectural design of buildings, especially houses, for others, and retail outlets featuring kits for constructing buildings, especially housesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 27, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 27, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 27, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 30, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 29, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 29, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 6, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 1995UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance