USPTO serial 74682845
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Just
DAVID L JUST LUCAS & JUST60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | architectural design of buildings, especially houses, for others, and retail outlets featuring kits for constructing buildings, especially houses | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |