CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TTARK

USPTO serial 74683927

TTARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MELNICK, DIANE B.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TTARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Shriver

ELIZABETH SHRIVER PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICES1320 BRADDOCK PLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of television programs and motion pictures, production of video discs, video tapes, and phonograph records, entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical band, fanciful characters, musical concerts, and comedy stages shows, directed to the tastes and humor of childrenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 13, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 21, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 15, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance