USPTO serial 74684131
*888
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEETZOW, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with *888?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WALTER E STEIMEL JR
WALTER E STEIMEL JR LOEB & LOEB LLP901 New York Ave NWSuite 300 EastWashington, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telephone telecommunication access, routing and completion services for mobile, cellular, and other wireless, two-way voice communication services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |