USPTO serial 74685159
WE THE PEOPLE NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WE THE PEOPLE NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger M. Milgrim
ROGER M MILGRIM DILWORTH PAXSON LLP3200 MELLON BANK CTR1735 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7595Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | pens, pencils, posters, pictoral and photographic prints, note pads, note cards, and publications concerning the United States Constitution, namely, booklets, books, newsletters and brochures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER, THE
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named WE THE PEOPLE NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 6, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |