USPTO serial 74685488
WORKLOGIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIFMAN, ARI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORKLOGIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
81669 Munchen, DE
81669 Munchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL D CHAPMAN
DANIEL D CHAPMAN MILLER, SISSON, CHAPMAN & NASH, PC300 CONVENT STSTE 1650SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205-3731Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for scanning and digitizing documents on paper, and for searching, indexing, storing, and retrieving the digitized documents | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |