USPTO serial 74685556
SAN-ESU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 1997
- Examiner
- FRUEHLING, EVERETT
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAN-ESU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Adachi-ku, Tokyo 121, JP
Adachi-ku, Tokyo 121, JP
Adachi-ku, Tokyo 121, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARIN SEGALL
KARIN SEGALL DARBY & DARBY PCPOST OFFICE BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [bean meal, condiments, namely, pickled radish, pickled ginger, and pickled plums; bean paste, sesame seeds and sesame oil] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 1995 |
| 030 | coffee, tea, bread, noodles and meals consisting primarily of noodles; rice, rice crackers, rice biscuits, rice porridge and meals consisting primarily of rice; crackers, biscuits, cakes, pastry, chocolates, confectionery in the form of candies, ice cream and sweets in the form of hard candy; cereal preparations in the form of bread sticks, pretzels and potato chips; pasta, condiments, namely, sesame salt consisting primarily of salt; horseradish; sauces, namely, sake sauce, brown rice vinegar, soy sauce, rice malt syrup and fruit vinegar, corn, flour-based, grain-based chips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 22, 2003 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2000 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |