USPTO serial 74688402
WEBFEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBFEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A GROW
MICHAEL A GROW ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting seminars and workshops in the field of computer software and services training and distributing course materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | Feb 4, 2000 |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing multiple-user access to computer information networks for the transfer and dissemination of information regarding computer networks, consultation, research, programming, software and software design | ACTIVE | Feb 4, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |