USPTO serial 74690895
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Halifax, West Yorkshire, HX1 1EB, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christie Baty Heinze
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 352GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-0352UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and computer programs relating to control systems and business management systems for use in manufacturing and process management environments | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting seminars, workshops and on-site training and providing instruction and training in the field of computers, computer software, computer systems maintenance, computer operation techniques, information technology, business management, business administration and control automation | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | computer programming services for others; computer software design for others; installation, maintenance and updating of computer software for others; design of computers for others; computer site design; technical consultation and research in the field of computer hardware and computer software, all relating to control systems and business management systems for use in manufacturing and process management environments; research and development of new products for others in the field of computer hardware and computer software, all relating to control systems and business management systems for use in manufacturing and process management environments; consultation in the field of computer hardware and software | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |