Drawing for D.I.Y.NET

USPTO serial 74694521

D.I.Y.NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with D.I.Y.NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles N. Quinn

CHARLES N QUINN DANN, DORFMAN, HERRELL & SKILLMAN1601 MARKET STSTE 720PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035supplying information, including general informative, instructional, educational and sales and availability information, including marketing information and data, relating to at home maintenance, alteration and/or construction performed primarily by homeowners, to suppliers of products and services for use in connection with and/or related to performance of such maintenance, alteration, and construction activities primarily by homeowners and to homeowners performing such maintenance, alteration, and construction activities, via electronic transmission over telephone lines including soliciting and accepting orders from such consumers, transmitting orders received from such consumers to suppliers, providing suppliers with information regarding shipment of those orders and providing suppliers with demographic information regarding sales inquiries and sales orders placed by such consumers, including demographics associated with the origin of those ordersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 28, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance