USPTO serial 74696720
RACE RADICALLY ACCELERATED COLD ELECTRONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CATALDO, PETER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RACE RADICALLY ACCELERATED COLD ELECTRONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Murphy
DAVID B MURPHY LYON & LYON633 W FIFTH STLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Superconductor Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Superconductor Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RACE RADICALLY ACCELERATED COLD ELECTRONICS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 22, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |