USPTO serial 74709227
MINT EDITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 16, 1997
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MINT EDITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Glen Ellyn, IL
DYERSVILLE, IA
Glen Ellyn, IL
Glen Ellyn, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENT A. LEE
KENT A LEE REINHART, BOERNER, VAN DEUREN, ET AL1000 N WATER ST STE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3186UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys, namely, die-cast collectible cars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Racing Champions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RC2 CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Racing Champions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Racing Champions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MINT EDITION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 15, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |