USPTO serial 74717765
SCHALTAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2206299Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 1, 1998
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCHALTAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
8406 Winterthur, CH
8406 Winterthur, CH
8406 Winterthur, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical, electropneumatic and electronic equipment and apparatus, namely, microprocessor based controls, personal computer based controlling equipment, stored program control equipment, switches, controls for industrial process automation indicators, operating devices for industrial process automation, switchboxes, mains receiver for industrial process automation, frequency switches, electrical, hydraulic and pneumatic controllers, electrical wires, and confectioned wires for industrial process automation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | custom manufacturing and assembling of connecting cables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | design and consultation in the fields of electrical, electropneumatic and electronic operating controls and circuits; electromagnetic compatibility tests and compatibility consulting, design, and planning, burn in tests | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rieter Holding Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Rieter Holding Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Rieter Holding Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SCHALTAG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 8, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |