USPTO serial 74721391
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Knechtel
ROBERT L KNECHTEL FOSTER, SWIFT, COLLINS & SMITH, PC313 S WASHINGTON SQLANSING, MI 48933UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed publications, namely newsletters and pamphlets on the subject of the dairy industry | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |