USPTO serial 74725717
CYBERCAMPUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBERCAMPUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip R. Zender
PHILIP R ZENDER GRAHAM & JAMESONE MARITIME PLZSTE 300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | video teleconferencing services | ACTIVE | Apr 14, 2000 |
| 042 | computerized on-line retail services in the field of general merchandise and consumer products; providing multiple user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information | ACTIVE | Apr 14, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NTT Software Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by NTT Software Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CYBERCAMPUS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 7, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |