USPTO serial 74736196
DELTAKEEPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2525323Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2002
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DELTAKEEPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
WATERKEEPERS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
WATERKEEPERS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla B. Oakley
CARLA B OAKLEY MORRISON & FOERSTER425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | bumper stickers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by San Francisco BayKeeper
- Other trademarks owned by BAYKEEPER
- Other trademarks owned by WATERKEEPERS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
- Other trademarks owned by WATERKEEPERS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
- Other trademarks owned by San Francisco BayKeeper
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named DELTAKEEPER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 24, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |