USPTO serial 74800324
AGNES B. LOLITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2001957Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 1996
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AGNES B. LOLITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75001 Paris, FR
75001 Paris, FR
75001 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brewster Taylor
BREWSTER TAYLOR LARSON AND TAYLOR727 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes and toilet waters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 8, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 6, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |