USPTO serial 74801425
VERSAILLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERSAILLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
6236 Eschborn bei Frankfort, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
CHARLES N QUINN MILLER & QUINNBROAD & CHESTNUT STS1125 LAND TITLE BLDGPHILADELPHIA, PA 19110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digitized typefaces stored in magnetic data carriers, namely magnetic disks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |