USPTO serial 74801566
LOLITA LEMPICKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOLITA LEMPICKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Lasky
MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH & EDELL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | spectacles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 27, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1995 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 3, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 12, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |