Drawing for ROSIE PENETRATING

USPTO serial 75010517

ROSIE PENETRATING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROSIE PENETRATING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Greigg

RONALD E GREIGG727 23RD ST S STE 220ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025visors, hats, T-shirts, overalls and jacketsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 22, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 14, 1997DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 1997ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 4, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance