USPTO serial 75011912
CYBERMOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBERMOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chad A. Klingbeil
CHAD A KLINGBEIL MOORE & HANSEN3000 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, an instructional, multimedia information and reference database featuring lifestyle and educational information and entertainment features, namely, movie reviews, available on CD-ROM | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |