USPTO serial 75016285
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Scofield
MICHAEL YAKIMO JR CHASE & YAKIMO4400 COLLEGE BLVDSTE 130OVERLAND PARK, KS 66211| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | housemark for a line of medical vaccines for human medical use, a line of medical anti-bodies and medical anti-toxins derived from eggs of chickens immunized against specific disease causing pathogens for the prevention and treatment of diseases in humans, and medical diagnostic preparations for human use | ACTIVE | Sep 26, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1998 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 11, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |