USPTO serial 75021948
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Krieger
MICHAEL F KRIEGER WORKMAN, NYDEGGER & SEELEY1800 EAGLE GATE TWR60 E S TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2000 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |