USPTO serial 75023135
AIR FRYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIR FRYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V. Bryan Medlock, Jr.
V BRYANN MEDLOCK JR SIDLEY & AUSTIN717 N HARWOOD, STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ovens, namely, commercial cooking impingement and convection ovens | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 1, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |