USPTO serial 75044747
CHEM FLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREENBAUM, CINDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHEM FLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maryam Bani-Jamali
MARYAM BANI-JAMALI LAW OFFICE OF MARYAM BANI-JAMALI2001 HOLCOMBE BLVD STE 2303HOUSTON, TX 77030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | manually operated metal valves, namely steel valves, gate valves, globe valves, check valves, butterfly valves, and ball valves; Y-strainers; and components and parts for valves and Y-strainers and sold therewith | ABANDONED | Nov 30, 1993 |
| 011 | plumbing fittings, namely steel valves, gate valves, globe valves, check valves, butterfly valves, ball valves, and Y-strainers; and components and parts therefor | ABANDONED | Nov 30, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |