USPTO serial 75045717
HEELWHEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEELWHEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M KELLY
DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear, namely, shoes, boots, and sandals; footwear components, namely, removable sockliners, heels, outsoles, midsoles, and subcomponents of such components, namely, non-orthopedic heel supports, non-orthopedic rear sole supports, non-orthopedic arch bridges, and non-orthopedic arch supports, motion control devices, namely, heel counters, and cushioning devices in the form of flexible plates and inserts; and clothing, namely, jeans, pants, overalls, bib pants, sweatpants, sweatshirts, warm-up suits, jumpsuits, running suits, sweaters, vests, shirts, T-shirts, caps, hats, visors, headbands, wristbands, gloves, socks, shorts, belts, briefs, bras, blouses, tights, leotards, unitards, tank tops, fitness tops, crop-tops, coats, jackets, parkas, swimwear, rainwear, water-resistant jackets, water-resistant pants, and water-resistant suits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |