Drawing for ISG INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP

USPTO serial 75055842

ISG INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISG INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryna S. Silver

BRYNA S SILVER SYNNESTVEDT & LECHNER2600 ARAMARK TWR1101 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037construction managementABANDONEDJan 1, 1997
042engineering and architectural design; environmental engineering; environmental consultation, namely, reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with environmental regulation; manufacturing process engineering; pharmaceutical engineering; pharmaceutical consultation, namely, consultation in the field of pharmaceutical manufacturing; validation of installed manufacturing equipment, namely, technical supervision and inspection of installed manufacturing equipmentABANDONEDJan 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 1999PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN—
Dec 28, 1998PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 1998ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Apr 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 1998SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 12, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 28, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 5, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance