Drawing for AUTOMATED VOICE MESSAGING

USPTO serial 75057154

AUTOMATED VOICE MESSAGING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOMATED VOICE MESSAGING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANN DUNN WESSBERG

ANN DUNN WESSBERG PATTERSON & KEOUGH PA1200 RAND TWR527 MARQUETTE AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in connection with interactive wearable computers, namely, software employing voice recognition features to facilitate hands-free operation of interactive wearable computersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 12, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance