USPTO serial 75071486
100% BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 100% BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIE HENDERSON KANBERG
JULIE HENDERSON KANGBERG THE GAP, INCONE HARRISON STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | baby oil; baby powder; shampoo; non-medicated diaper cream; skin and toilet soap; body lotion; body shampoo; eau de toilette, cologne, and perfume | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |