USPTO serial 75073088
M MAJESTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M MAJESTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Miyoshi
DAVID MIYOSHI DAVID M MIYOSHIONE PARK PLZ3250 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1610LOS ANGELES, CA 90010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | engine motor mufflers, exhaust manifolds, header pipes for automotive engines | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | automotive headlight covers and taillight lenses | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | structural parts of automobiles, namely, ground effect moldings for cars and trucks, automotive suspension parts, namely, lowering struts and shocks, brake linings for automobiles, steering wheels for automobiles, furniture for conversion vans, namely, seats and chairs, fuel caps, automobile carriers for luggage, skis, bikes, and tires, automotive exhaust pipes, license plate holders, anti-theft alarms for automobiles and trucks, automotive consoles, automotive sunroofs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1999 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |