USPTO serial 75074665
ENVIRO-BRITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENVIRO-BRITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Zalewa
JAMES D ZALEWA LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | metallic coating services for resisting ultraviolet ray damage for plastic parts for use by the automotive industry and the exterior lighting industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2002 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |