Drawing for CIRCUIT CITY

USPTO serial 75096795

CIRCUIT CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIRCUIT CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Dalton Baril

MARY DALTON BARIL MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, LLPONE JAMES CTR901 CARY STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4030

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal license platesABANDONED—
008folding knivesABANDONED—
009racing helmetsABANDONED—
011flashlightsABANDONED—
014jewelry, watches, wall clocks, lighters made of precious metalsABANDONED—
016paper goods and printed matter, namely, bumper stickers, decals, wall calendars, window stickers, brochures, paper pennants, collectible cards, posters and books featuring automobile racingABANDONED—
018knapsacks, fanny packs, umbrellasABANDONED—
024cloth flagsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 30, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 30, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 24, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 1, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 8, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance