USPTO serial 75103066
G.I.S.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROCKETT, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G.I.S.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Wray
JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | consultation services for assisting distributors of chain and sprockets in locating and identifying potential customers for chains and sprockets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |