USPTO serial 75114857
LLOYD'S LLOYD'S OF LONDON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LLOYD'S LLOYD'S OF LONDON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London EC3M 7HA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian Polak
VIVIAN POLAK LEBOEUF, LAMB, GREENE & MACRAE, LLP125 W 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019-5389UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | computer services, namely, providing information relating to the fields of insurance and insurance services via an interactive computer database | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |