Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 75152131?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/75152131. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns ULTRA SLIM-LINE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 75152131, the listed owner(s) include: Rosen Product Development.

What is USPTO serial number 75152131?

Serial number 75152131 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark ULTRA SLIM-LINE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of ULTRA SLIM-LINE?

ULTRA SLIM-LINE (75152131) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover ULTRA SLIM-LINE?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 75152131

ULTRA SLIM-LINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Aug 19, 1996
Status date: Sep 3, 2003
Registration date: —
Examiner: PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
Law office: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA SLIM-LINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Rosen Product Development
Eugene, OR
Other trademarks owned by Rosen Product Development

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID P COOPER

DAVID P COOPER KOLISCH HARTWELL DICKINSONMCCORMACK & HEUSER520 S W YAMHILL ST STE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	computer accessories, namely, hardware systems for mounting with monitors	ACTIVE	Feb 20, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 27, 2004	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jan 29, 2004	CFIT	CASE FILE IN TICRS	—
Sep 9, 2003	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Sep 3, 2003	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 30, 2002	CNCF	CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	—
Nov 29, 2002	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 29, 2002	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 9, 2002	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 23, 2002	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2002	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 6, 2001	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED	—
Oct 10, 2001	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 24, 2001	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2001	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 22, 2001	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 21, 2001	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 20, 2001	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jan 24, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 20, 2000	UNPR	UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED	—
Apr 20, 2000	CNCF	CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	—
Apr 13, 2000	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 12, 2000	REIN	REINSTATED	—
Mar 11, 2000	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 1999	CNCF	CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	—
Jan 19, 1999	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 17, 1998	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 1998	ZZZX	PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN	—
Jun 29, 1998	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jun 29, 1998	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 29, 1998	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 24, 1997	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 1997	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 10, 1997	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 1997	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—