USPTO serial 75155392
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN DIEGO, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Skale
Andrew D. Skale MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C3580 CARMEL MOUNTAIN ROADSUITE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | electronic and computerized interactive distributorship, shopping and retailing services for a variety of goods and items for business, professional and personal needs, namely, clothing, toys, sporting goods, exercise equipment, housewares and household goods, detergents, soap and cleaning products, goods for the care of teeth, hair, nails and other personal care products, lawn and garden products and equipment, power and hand tools, automotive goods; furniture, office supplies and equipment, computer hardware, CD ROMs, large and small electrical appliances, lighting and electrical supplies and equipment, cameras, consumer electronics, radios, televisions, telephones, luggage, jewelry, watches, writing instruments, office products; retail drug store services; retail bakery store services | ACTIVE | May 4, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 17, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 3, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 3, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |