USPTO serial 75161829
SBDBASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 10, 2002
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SBDBASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
Structural Bioinformatics Inc.
San Diego, CA
Structural Bioinformatics Inc.
San Diego, CA
Structural Bioinformatics Inc.
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES C WESEMAN
JAMES C WESEMAN THE LAW OFFICE OF JAMES C WESEMAN401 W A ST STE 1600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software containing databases of information in the field of bioinformatics and facilitating access thereto | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 17, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAMNARAYAN, KAL
- Other trademarks owned by Structural Bioinformatics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Structural Bioinformatics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Structural Bioinformatics Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SBDBASE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |