USPTO serial 75178040
VASP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VASP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK H TIDMAN
MARK H TIDMAN BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications computer software and computer programs for use with telecommunications networks, namely, computer software and computer programs for the transmission, delivery, and receipt of voice, facsimile, and data communications; computer software and computer programs for automated caller option routing functionality; computer software and computer programs for automated order processing functionality; computer software and computer programs for supporting access to telecommunications networks; computer software and computer programs to support paging functionality in telecommunications networks; computer software and computer programs to enable telecommunications networks to provide information of general interest to users by alphanumeric paging, interactive voice response, and message notification; computer software and computer programs for mobile facsimile functionality; computer software and computer programs for speaker independent voice recognition, automatic fax/data recognition, text to speech conversion, and pulse to DTMF conversion; and computer software and computer programs for telecommunications networks specialized resource functionality, call control functionality, and service switching functionality | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CMG Telecommunications & Utilities B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CMG Telecommunications & Utilities B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VASP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |