Drawing for PC WHOLESALE

USPTO serial 75178162

PC WHOLESALE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PC WHOLESALE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SAMUEL FIFER

SAMUEL FIFER SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL8000 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6404

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016catalogsACTIVE—
035telephone, mail and fax order services featuring computer hardware, software, and computer peripheralsACTIVEOct 1, 1989
037computer hardware and peripherals installationACTIVEOct 1, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 13, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 14, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 14, 2002EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Aug 20, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 4, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 20, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 2, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 11, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 12, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance